VNII Galurgii JSC, Perm, Russia¹ ; Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia² ; Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia³

V. A. Voroshilov^1,2,3, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, vniig@uralkali.com

VNII Galurgii JSC, Perm, Russia¹ ; Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia²
R. I. Tsarev^1,2, Research Area Manager, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor

VNII Galurgii JSC, Perm, Russia
A. M. Prigara, Research Area Manager, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
A. A. Zhukov, Head of Laboratory, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

After mining-out, large cross-section rooms are backfilled with slurry using hydraulic method, and brines are then removed from the hydraulic fill. During backfilling of large cross-section rooms, salt precipitate develops because of cooling of slurry and NaCl-KCl disbalance. As a result, the hydraulic fill brine can dissolve pillars left between the large cross-section rooms. As a consequence, during backfill of large-cross section rooms, their walls are exposed to leaching and degradation under the impact of brines and because of solubility of salts. For this reason, up to full backfill of large cross-section rooms, it is required to supervise their condition and dimension, as well as the physical properties of pillars separating the large cross-section rooms from the operating rooms in a mine. It is critical to eliminate disintegration of the rib pillars of large cross-section rooms, and, therefore, the use of the methods which can disintegrate them (for instance, drilling) is unacceptable. It is only possible to stick to the nondestructive control of the condition of the rib pillars using geophysical methods. The geophysical methods allow monitoring condition of the pillars fencing the large cross-section rooms. The aim of the research was to develop and substantiate a methodology for determining the actual width and physical properties of the pillars separating large cross-section rooms from other mine openings. The analysis of capabilities of geophysical methods in handling this mining problem in the conditions of a potassium salt deposit, and the authors’ own studies show that the most promising methods for this purpose are ground penetrating radar and seismic survey. The implemented full-scale research trialed and validated the integrated application of GPR and seismic surveying. The article demonstrates the operability and efficiency of the mentioned combination of geophysical methods allowing controlling the thickness of the rib pillars between large cross-section rooms. The features of the seismic survey data processing to suppress reflections from geological levels and to distinguish reflections from the walls of large cross-section rooms are described.

1. Giannino F., Leucci G. Electromagnetic Methods in Geophysics: Applications in GeoRadar, FDEM, TDEM, and AEM. Hoboken : Wiley, 2022. 304 p.
2. Teare B. L., Ruiz H., Agbona A., Wolfe M., Dobreva I. et al. Effect of soil water on GPR estimation of bulked roots, methods, and suggestions. Research Square. 2021. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-907807/v1
3. Gendzwill D. J., Brehm R. High‐resolution seismic reflections in a potash mine. Geophysics. 1993. Vol. 58, Iss. 5. pp. 741–748.
4. Rapetsoa M. K., Manzi M. S. D., Westgate M., Sihoyiya M., James I. et al. Cost-effective in-mine seismic experiments to image platinum deposits and associated geological structures at Maseve platinum mine, South Africa. Near Surface Geophysics. 2022. Vol. 20, Iss. 6. pp. 572–589.
5. Rapetsoa M. K., Manzi M. In-mine seismic method for platinum orebody exploration in Maseve Platinum Mine, South Africa. NSG2021 27^th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Bordeaux, 2021. Vol. 2021. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202120195
6. Savich A. I., Koptev V. I., Nikitin V. N., Yashchenko Z. G. Seismic Methods of Hard Rock Study. Moscow : Nedra, 1969. 239 p.
7. Antsiferov A. V., Glukhov A. A., Antsiferov V. A. Mine seismic prediction of tectonic faults by reflected waves using the method of location. MIAB. 2020. No. 6. pp. 131–139.
8. Glukhov A. A. Analysis of the informative value of seismic exploration methods for predicting the location of zones of probable methane accumulation. Transactions of RАNIMI. Donetsk, 2023. No. 23(38). pp. 9–20.
9. Babkin A. I. Dimensional interferencial systems of seismic and acoustic observations in conditions of potassium mines. MIAB. 2010. No. 1. pp. 261–267.
10. Babkin A. I. Mine seismoacoustics by the method of multiple overlaps (by the example of the Verkhnekamskoe potassium salt deposit) : Theses of Dissertation of Candidate of Engineering Sciences. Perm, 2001. 20 p.
11. Vagin V. B. Underground Seismics Methods of Salt Rock Mass Study. Minsk : BelNITs “Ekologiya”, 2010. 188 p.
12. Kulagov E. V. Features of seismic waves excited in salt rock mass of the Starobinsk deposit. Litosfera. 2012. No. 2(37). pp. 105–111.
13. Zhukov A. A., Prigara A. M., Tsarev R. I., Shustkina I. Yu. Method of mine seismic survey for studying geological structure features of Verkhnekamskoye salt deposit. MIAB. 2019. No. 4. pp. 121–136.
14. Zhukov A. A., Prigara A. M., Tsarev R. I., Shustkina I. Yu., Voroshilov V. A. Influence of sources and receivers directivity on results of mine seismic survey. Geofizika. 2019. No. 5. pp. 26–36.
15. Glukhikh A. V., Tsarev R. I., Zhukov A. A., Moroshkina Yu. N., Prigara A. M. Geological substantiation of the results of mine seismic survey on shear waves with reflection separation. Geophysics in Engineering and Mining. The 16th Conference with Seminar on Geology in Engineering and Mining 2020. Perm, 2020. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202051151
16. Zhukov A. A., Prigara A. M., Tsarev R. I., Voroshilov V. A. Solution of mining engineering problems at a potassium salt deposit using geophysical methods. MIAB. 2022. No. 5-1. pp. 82–91.
17. Funk C. W., Brehm R., Errington A. F. C., Backstrom K. An apparatus for collecting upward-looking GPR surveys in potash Mines. 2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. Hong Kong, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572684
18. Funk C., Protz L., Van Den Berghe M., Belanger Z. Insights gained after five years of continuous GPR use in potash mines. Proceedings of the 19^th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. Golden, 2022. pp. 47–50.
19. Momayez M., Hassani F. P., Hara A., Sadri A. Application of GPR in Canada mines. CIM Bulletin. 1996. Vol. 89. pp. 107–110.
20. Weissling B., Rubio G. Evaluating GPR for geotechnical and hazards assessment of deep mine geology. Fast Times. 2009. Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 26–31.
21. Narayan I., Singh S., Joshi A., Ghosh S., Khan R. A. Utility of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) as a tool for slope stability studies in Saraipali OC mine, Korba area. 2021. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358041970_Utility_of_Ground_Penetrating_Radar_GPR_as_a_tool_for_slope_stability_studies_in_Saraipali_OC_mine_Korba_area (accessed: 19.12.2024).