ArticleAuthorData |
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia
M. S. Lisyatnikov, Associate Professor, Department of Building Structures S. I. Roshchina, Professor, Head of the Department of Building Structures E. S. Prusov, Professor, Department of Functional and Constructional Materials Technology
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia1 ; Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China2 ; National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow, Russia3 V. B. Deev*, Professor, Chief Researcher1, Professor at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation2, Professor at the Department of Metal Forming3, e-mail: deev.vb@mail.ru
*Correspondence author. |
Abstract |
Deformable aluminum alloys have found extensive application in construction, either as standalone bar or sheet structures or as components in composite constructions based on concrete or wood. The latter type is gaining traction due to its ability to counterbalance the negative properties of one material with the positive attributes of another. Combining aluminum and wood enables the creation of structures with high physico-mechanical properties, aesthetic appearance, and good serviceability, including in some chemically aggressive environments or under exposure to low temperatures. This study examines the load-bearing capacity of aluminum-wood floor panels, focusing on the influence of rib crosssectional shape and the type of deformable aluminum alloy from which they are fabricated. The upper sheathing of the panels under study consists of 12-mm thick plywood sheets. The ribs are directed downward and positioned along the perimeter as well as transversely in the middle, at the junction of the plywood sheets. The types of aluminum profiles used include a rectangular tube measuring 60×120×4 mm, a channel measuring 100×40×3 mm, and an I-beam measuring 116×100×5 mm. The profile materials are chosen from three commonly used aluminum alloys: 6061, 6063, and 7075, all thermally treated to T6 conditions. To select the most effective cros s-sectional shape and alloy for the ribs in the composite floor panel, numerical modeling was carried out using the finite element method in the ANSYS software suite. The results yielded stress and vertical displacement isofields. Based on the combined performance and techno-economic indicators (strength utilization factor, stiffness, and cost), the channel profile made from 6061 T6 and 6063 T6 alloys is recommended as the most optimal choice for panel ribs.
The research was carried out within the state assignment in the field of scientific activity of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme FZUN-2024-0004, state assignment of the VlSU). |
References |
1. Wang T., Wang Y., Crocetti R., Franco L., Schweigler M., Wålinder M. An Innovative Timber-Steel Hybrid Beam Consisting of Glulam Mechanically Reinforced by Means of Steel Rod: Analytical and Preliminary Numerical Investigations. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021. Vol. 43. 102549.
2. Roshchina S., Lukin M., Lisyatnikov M. Compressed-Bent Reinforced Wooden Elements with Long-Term Load. Proceedings of EECE 2019. Springer Cham, 2020. pp. 81–91. 3. Wang Y., Liang C., Zhang B., Qu S., Gao Y., Zhang X. Mechanical Properties of Fast-Growing Poplar Glulam Columns Reinforced with Steel Plate. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2023. Vol. 18. e01825. 4. Lukin M., Prusov E., Roshchina S., Karelina M., Vatin N. Multi-Span Composite Timber Beams with Rational Steel Reinforcements. Buildings. 2021. Vol. 11, Iss. 2. 46. 5. Wdowiak-Postulak A. Numerical, Theoretical and Experimental Models of the Static Performance of Timber Beams Reinforced with Steel, Basalt and Glass pre-Stressed Bars. Composite Structures. 2023. Vol. 305. 116479. 6. De Luca V., Marano C. Prestressed Glulam Timbers Reinforced with Steel Bars. Construction and Building Materials. 2012. Vol. 30. pp. 206–217. 7. Naichuk A., Pogoreltsev A., Demchuk I., Ivaniuk A., Roshchina S. Rigid Joint of Bent Glued Laminated Timber Structures Using Inclined Glued-In Rods. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2022. Vol. 182. pp. 501–521. 8. Lukin M. V., Roshchina S., Gribanov A. S., Naychuk A. Ya. Stress-Strain State of Wooden Beams with External Reinforcement. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 896. 012066. 9. Koshcheev A. A., Roshchina S. I., Naichuk A. Y., Vatin N. I. The Effect of Eccentricity on the Strength Characteristics of Glued Rods Made of Steel Cable Reinforcement in Solid Wood. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 896. 012059. 10. Gunasekaran P., Alamdari M. M., Goudarzi H. V. P. Ultrasonic Based Defect Detection in Steel-Reinforced Laminated Timber Structural Elements Using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). Automation in Construction. 2024. Vol. 160. 105296. 11. Georgantzia E., Gkantou M., Kamaris G. S. Aluminium Alloys as Structural Material: a Review of Research. Engineering Structures. 2021. Vol. 227. 111372. 12. Sun Y. The Use of Aluminum Alloys in Structures: Review and Outlook. Structures. 2023. Vol. 57. 105290. 13. Ying J., Liu H., Chen Z., Liu X., Ouyang Y. Study on the Compressive Stability of H-Shaped Members with Roof-Connection Construction in Aluminum Alloy Latticed Shell. Engineering Structures. 2024. Vol. 311. 118176. 14. Aydogdu I., Kilic V., Akin A. Optimum Design of Pin-Jointed Aluminum Structures to AA-ASD Using Three Meta-Heuristic Algorithms. Structures. 2023. Vol. 55. pp. 1406–1422. 15. Sun G., Xiao S., Wu J., Zheng J., Qin J. Shaking Table Test and Simulation on Seismic Performance of Aluminum Alloy Reticulated Shell Structures Under Elastic and Elastic-Plastic Stage. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024. Vol. 97. 110878. 16. Wang Z., Li M., Han Q., Yun X., Zhou K., Gardner L., Mazzolani F. M. Structural Fire Behaviour of Aluminium Alloy Structures: Review and Outlook. Engineering Structures. 2022. Vol. 268. 114746. 17. Mymrin V., Pedroso D. E., Pedroso C. L., Avanci M. A., Rolim P. H. B., Carvalho K. Q., Catai R. E. Physical-Chemical Processes of Sustainable Construction Materials Structure Formation with Iron Ore Processing Tailings and Aluminum Anodizing Sludge. Construction and Building Materials. 2021. Vol. 298. 123698. 18. Amirtharaj J., Mariappan M. Exploring the Potential Uses of Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites (AMMCs) as Alter natives to Steel Bar in Reinforced Concrete (RC) Structures-A State of Art Review. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023. Vol. 80. 108085. 19. Saleh S. M., Jasim N. A. Structural Behavior of Timber Aluminum Composite Beams Under Static Loads. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 2014. Vol. 3, Iss. 10. 1166–1173. 20. Saleh S. M., Jasim N. A. Structural Behavior of Timber Aluminum Composite Beams Under Impact Loads. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 2014. Vol. 5, Iss. 10. pp. 865–873. 21. Szumigala M., Chybinski M., Polus L. Preliminary Analysis of the Aluminium-Timber Composite Beams. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports. 2017. Vol. 27, Iss. 4. pp. 131–141. 22. Chybinski M., Polus L. Theoretical, Experimental and Numerical Study of Aluminium-Timber Composite Beams with Screwed Connections. Construction and Building Materials. 2019. Vol. 226. pp. 317–330. 23. Chybinski M., Polus L. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Aluminium-Timber Composite Beams with Bolted Connections. Structures. 2021. Vol. 34. pp. 1942–1960. 24. Jiao S., Gunalan S., Gilbert B.P., Baleshan B., Bailleres H. Experimental Investigation of an Innovative Composite Mullion Made of Aluminium and Timber. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021. Vol. 38. 101907. 25. Zhou Yo., Zhao Y., Wang C.-L., Zhou Yi., Zheng J. Experimental Study of the Shear Performance of H-Shaped Aluminum-Timber Composite Connections. Construction and Building Materials. 2022. Vol. 334. 127421. 26. Gou B., Wang X., Wang R., Wu C. Investigating the Failure Behaviour of Aluminium Alloy Gusset Joints Under Impact Loading: an Experimental and Numerical Study. Thin-Walled Structures. 2023. Vol. 191. 111083. 27. Tan Y., Zhang Y., Zhang Q., Fan F. Structural Performance of a Novel Combined Nested Bolted Joint for Aluminum Alloy Mega-Latticed Structures. Structures. 2023. Vol. 57. 105246. 28. Mohanavel V., Prasath S., Arunkumar M., Pradeep G. M., Surendra Babu S. Modeling and Stress Analysis of Aluminium Alloy Based Composite Pressure Vessel Through ANSYS software. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 37, Pt. 2. pp. 1911–1916. 29. Liu H., Ma C., Ying J., Guo L., Chen Z. Mechanical Performance and Design of Aluminium Alloy Beam String Structures. Thin-Walled Structures. 2024. Vol. 199. 111798. |