Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia:

Zenkov I. V., Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, zenkoviv@mail.ru
Morin A. S., Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
Vokin V. N., Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
Kiryushina E. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Using the remote monitoring data, the authors review the quarrying operations which supply crushed stone production in 22 regions of Russia. The overall mechanization of crushed stone quarries is identified with respect to the available mining and haulage machines. The specification data of the machines make it possible to determine production capacity of each quarry in terms of rock mass. The highest weight (58.5 %) in the structure of the cumulative annual crushed stone production in Russia is observed in the European part of the country. The overall production potential of crushed stone factories in Russia is evaluated as 230 Mt per year.

1. Zenkov I. V., Zhukova V. V., Nefedov B. N. et al. Open pit mines of nonferrous metallurgy in Russia from space. Mining and disturbed land ecology. Krasnoyarsk : SFU, 2019. 604 p.
2. Zenkov I. V., Lukianova A. A., Anishchenko Yu. A. et al. Crushed stone quarries in Russia from space. Mining and disturbed land ecology. Krasnoyarsk : SFU, 2020. 328 p.
3. Zenkov I. V., Lukianova A. A., Yuronen Yu. P. et al. Open pit mines at nonmetallic deposits. Mining and disturbed land ecology. Krasnoyarsk : SFU, 2020. 652 p.
4. Bolin J. A., Schoeman D. S., Pizà-Roca C., Scales K. L. A current affair: entanglement of humpback whales in coastal shark-controlnets. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020. Vol. 6, Iss. 2. рр. 119–128.
5. Taylor A., Biswas T., Randall J. M., Klausmeyer K., Cohen B. Parched pines: a quantitative comparison of two multi-year droughts and associated mass mortalities of bishop pine (Pinus muricata) on Santa Cruz Island, California. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020. Vol. 6, Iss. 1. рр. 20–34.
6. Ancin-Murguzur F. J., Munoz L., Monz C., Hausner V. H. Drones as a tool to monitor human impacts and vegetation changes in parks and protected areas. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020. Vol. 6, Iss. 1. рр. 105–113.
7. Wagner F. H., Sanchez A., Tarabalka Y., Lotte R. G., Ferreira M. P. et al. Using the U-net convolutional network to map forest types and disturbance in the Atlantic rainforest with very high resolution images. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 4. рр. 360–375.
8. Kamm M., Reed J. M. Use of visible spectrum UAS photography for land cover classification at nest sites of a declining bird species (Falco sparverius). Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 3. рp. 259–271.
9. Mirkovic D., Stepanian P. M., Wainwright Ch. E., Reynolds D. R., Myles H. M. Menz. Characterizing animal anatomy and internal composition for electromagnetic modelling in radar entomology. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 2. рр. 169–179.
10. Beresford A. E., Sanderson F. J., Donald P. F., Burfield I. J., Butler A. et al. Phenology and climate change in Africa and the decline of Afro-Palearctic migratory bird populations. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 1. рр. 55–69.
11. Muir J., Phinn S., Eyre T., Scarth P. Measuring plot scale woodland structure using terrestrial laser scanning. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2018. Vol. 4, Iss. 4. рр. 320–338.
12. Fernandes K., van der Heyde M., Bunce M., Dixon K., Harris R. J. DNA metabarcoding – new approach to fauna monitoring in mine site restoration. Restoration Ecology. 2018. Vol. 26, Iss. 6. pp. 1098–1107.
13. Hofmeester T. R., Young Sh., Juthberg S., Singh N. J., Widemo F. et al. Using by-catch data from wildlife surveys to quantify climatic parameters and timing of phenology for plants and animals using camera traps. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020. Vol. 6, Iss. 2. рр. 129–140.
14. Neumann C., Behling R., Schindhelm A., Itzerott S., Weiss G. et al. The colors of heath flowering – quantifying spatial patterns of phenology in Calluna life-cycle phases using highresolution drone imagery. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020. Vol. 6, Iss. 1. рр. 35–51.
15. Erlandsson R., Stoessel M., Skanes H., Wennbom M., Angerbjorn A. An innovative use of orthophotos – possibilities to assess plant productivity from colour infrared aerial orthophotos. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 4. рр. 291–301.
16. Hislop S., Jones S., Soto-Berelov M., Skidmore A., Haywood A. et al. High fire disturbance in forests leads to longer recovery, but varies by forest type. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 4. рр. 376–388.
17. Niedballa J., Wilting A., Sollmann R., Hofer H., Courtiol A. Assessing analytical methods for detecting spatiotemporal interactions between species from camera trapping data. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 3. рр. 272–285.
18. Pina-Covarrubias E., Hill A. P., Prince P., Snaddon J. L., Rogers A. et al. Optimization of sensor deployment for acoustic detection and localization in terrestrial environments. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 2. рр. 180–192.
19. Attanayake A. U., Xu D., Guo X., Lamb E. G. Long-term sand dune spatio-temporal dynamics and endemic plant habitat extent in the Athabasca sand dunes of northern Saskatchewan. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2019. Vol. 5, Iss. 1. рр. 70–86.
20. Torrent L., López-Baucells A., Rocha R., Bobrowiec P. E. D., Meyer C. F. J. The importance of lakes for bat conservation in Amazonian rainforests: an assessment using autonomous recorders. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2018. Vol. 4, Iss. 4. рр. 339–351.